HPC Market Watch

Intel, Apple: High Hurdles to Any Foundry Relationship, Says Bernstein
Bernstein Research's chip analyst Stacy Rasgon and Samsung Electronics ( 005930KS ) analyst Mark Newman and Apple ( AAPL ) analyst Toni Sacconaghi this morning issue a combined report on the prospects that Intel ( INTC ) might win foundry business from Apple, concluding that "such a relationship would be fraught with business and strategic issues (on both sides) that would require extremely careful management." The authors note that debate has "increased recently" over whether Intel may win some business tabbing Apple's "A" series processors for its iPhone , iPad and iPod Touch , given the chip maker's "significant capacity additions" and the constraints at other chip foundries, including Samsung's. Although Intel is substantially increasing capital spending on its factories, with $12.95 billion projected for next year, up from $12.55 billion this year and $10.76 spent last year, that doesn't necessarily mean Intel will make chips for Apple, despite speculation along those lines. "We disagree with this simplistic line of reasoning – any decision to enter foundry will be a strategic choice, independent and distinct from Intel's current capex strategy." Intel has already said that if demand falls short of what they can produce, the company will repurpose chip making assets to the next node, they write. On the one hand, it's unlikely Apple would do what Intel wants, which is to shift from using a processor core based on designs from Intel competitor ARM Holdings ( ARMH ): We believe a move by Apple to make broad use of x86 in their iOS line is unlikely. We believe that Apple gains significant advantages from their vertically-integrated stack of semiconductor design, software, and hardware - note, for example, that their iPhone 4S, while manufactured at a mature 45nm node, is better on power and performance than virtually all other devices today in a testament to their abilities (Exhibit 5). While access to 22/14/10nm from Intel would provide significant advantages, we believe a move to x86 on iOS would therefore be a non-starter as Apple would lose their ability to optimize the full platform as it currently does with their internal ARM architecture. However, given the ongoing patent battles with Samsung, Apple has a real need to consider alternatives, the authors write. They might be compelled to consider Intle if Intel could grant a similar " Chinese Wall " between its own processor development and the tabbing of chips for Apple, as long as Intel could gain insights that would benefit its own mobile chip design.
Related Stocks:
Stock Market XML and JSON Data API provided by FinancialContent Services, Inc.
Nasdaq quotes delayed at least 15 minutes, all others at least 20 minutes.
Markets are closed on certain holidays. Stock Market Holiday List
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
Press Release Service provided by PRConnect.
Stock quotes supplied by Six Financial
Postage Rates Bots go here

Share This